Automotive Substances of Concern
Many automobile manufacturers have developed lists of material which must be reported, restricted or
prohibited entirely. Nickel, in the metallic and alloy forms, is generally not restricted but its
use may have to be reported. The question has been raised whether certain applications of nickel in
automotive applications, where it may come in contact with human skin, are appropriate.
"Nickel Directive" of the EU
In 1994, the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union passed a Directive on nickel which
recognized that "the presence of nickel in certain objects coming into direct and prolonged contact with the
skin may cause sensitization of humans to nickel and may lead to allergic reactions".
Member States were required to pass national legislation necessary to comply with Directive
94/27/EEC, that nickel may not be used:
in products intended to come into direct and prolonged contact with the skin such as:
- earrings,
- necklaces, bracelets and chains, anklets, finger rings,
- wrist-watch cases, watch straps and tighteners,
- rivet buttons, tighteners, rivets, zippers and metal marks, when these are used in garments
if the rate of nickel release from the parts of these products coming into direct and prolonged contact with
the skin is greater than 0.5 :g/cm²/week in a standard sweat test.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31994L0027:EN:HTML
The nickel industry supports the objectives of Directive 94/27/EEC in reducing the incidence of nickel
allergy and nickel allergic contact dermatitis. Controls on the use of nickel-containing articles should be
based on an assessment of the level of nickel release and the duration and nature of exposure not on nickel
content. A full statement of the nickel industry's position on this issue can be found at: Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Despite the fact that the EU Nickel Directive was intended for articles such as jewelry which are "intended
to come into direct and prolonged contact with the skin", it appears to have been recently adopted by some
automakers in their restricted substances lists.
Is the Nickel Directive Relevant?
The basis of the EU Nickel Directive is that for a nickel-containing product to be a possible cause of allergic contact dermatitis it needs both to be used in close and prolonged contact with the skin requires prolonged and to release considerable amounts of nickel when in such contact.
All common nickel-containing grades of stainless steel show very low nickel release rates in sweat tests and hence should cause no concern in any skin contact applications. (The exception might be certain sulphur-containing machinable grades, such as type 303 stainless steel. Use of these grades should be assessed with care.)
Nickel metal, copper-nickel alloys, nickel-plated articles and chromium-nickel plated articles are all likely to release more nickel in sweat tests than is recognized as permissible under the nickel directive. Therefore it would be inappropriate for such products to be used where they can be expected to be in close contact with the skin for prolonged periods.
In the automobile industry, chromium-nickel plating is widely used on substrates such as aluminum, steel, zinc and plastics. The majority of these parts, such as plated wheels and automotive trim, are external and are unlikely to be "routinely touched". Plated door handles and some interior parts such as switches, gear shifts, etc may be routinely touched in normal use, but the skin contact is expected to be brief and intermittent. Continuing use of chromium-nickel plating for such parts is very appropriate.
We continually encounter identical products in daily life from drawer pulls, faucet handles, door handles, packaging and so on. Such products are ubiquitous and our contact opportunities enormous. Routine touching is not "direct and prolonged contact with the skin. There is simply no evidence that routine touching of nickel chrome plated products leads to nickel allergic contact dermatitis.
In some designs of seat belts, especially those that are front-fastening, it is possible that the metal fasteners could be in contact with the skin over a long period. Although there are no reported instances of dermatitis associated with such parts, manufacturers might consider using stainless steel in preference to chromium-nickel plated steel for fasteners in such seat belt designs. Alternatively, manufacturers might consider modifying the seat belt design to remove any risk of prolonged skin contact during normal use.
Another part which could conceivably be in longer than intermittent contact with the skin might be the
steering wheel. Again, there are no reported instances of dermatitis being associated with such parts but
manufacturers might consider using alternatives to chromium-nickel plating for such parts on a precautionary
basis.
For a more complete statement of the nickel industry's position click on Nickel Allergic Contact Dermatitis and product stewardship.
Comments? Send them to bwaters@nickelinstitute.org.
